I found this to be an interesting read.
#^Conservatism, Not PopulismIn other words, what we’re witnessing is two competing moral panics over the future of democracy, or perhaps two sides to the same moral panic. This, too, is reassuring if you squint and ignore a lot of the noise, because it’s a quintessentially American argument about defending democracy.
Speaking in broad generalizations, one side believes that maximizing turnout is essential to democracy, while the other side believes that “integrityâ€â€”i.e. the absence of fraud—is essential to democracy. There are good faith and intellectually defensible arguments on both sides of this conflict of visions.
